Cover of: Light rail transit capital cost study | Donald C. Schneck Read Online

Light rail transit capital cost study by Donald C. Schneck

  • 921 Want to read
  • ·
  • 78 Currently reading

Published by U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Office of Technical Assistance and Safety, Available through NTIS in Washington, D.C.], Springfield, Va .
Written in English

Book details:

Edition Notes

Statement[Donald C. Schneck, Richard M. Amodei and Michael G. Ferreri] ; prepared by Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc. ; with assistance from Gibbs & Hill and Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas
ContributionsAmodei, Richard M., Ferreri, Michael G., United States. Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Office of Technical Assistance and Safety, Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Gibbs & Hill, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas
The Physical Object
Pagination1 v. (various foliations) ;
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL25844893M

Download Light rail transit capital cost study


  The Capital Cost Database is a Microsoft Access database of as-built costs for 54 federally funded projects in the following modes: bus rapid transit, commuter rail, light rail, heavy rail . This fixed guideway capital cost study is intended to provide a data base of actual unit costs for the various asset components used in the construction of light rail transit systems. The transit authorities operating these recently-completed light rail systems supplied the basic component. University Transportation Research Center 1 FTA: Analysis of Capital Cost Elements 1. Introduction With the development of new light rail systems throughout the U.S. over the last quarter century, concerns have arisen over cost growth on these capital projects. Rising costs pose a significant challenge for agencies seeking to finance new projects. LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT CAPITAL COST STUDY. FINAL REPORT. The purpose of the fixed guideway capital cost study is to develop a capital cost database of actual unit costs to construct and procure the various assets necessary to operate mass transit busway and rail systems. It is the first in a series of studies to examine the actual costs of major.

Rising light rail capital costs are a significant concern for the Federal Transit Administration and for its partner agencies at the local level. The report discusses three distinct types of cost growth: cost overruns, unit cost escalation, and project escalation. RAIL RIDERSHIP Since MORE THAN 19% INCREASE IN POPULATION GROWTH 1, RURAL public transit systems 4,+ NONPROFIT transit systems URBAN public transit systems BILLION BILLION BILLION Increase in Vehicle Miles Operated per Kilowatt-Hour over the Past 30 Years HEAVY RAIL: 24% LIGHT RAIL/STREETCAR: 33%.   Dubbed Sound Transit 3, or ST3, the framework for the original initiative included almost $37 billion of capital expenditures for commuter rail, light rail, express bus, bus rapid transit service.   All metro rail systems across the U.S.—which include heavy rail, such as subways and elevated trains, and light rail, which operates at street level—reported operating at a loss in These.

  Indeed, in the study for Atlanta’s I East extension, there are options for light rail and bus rapid transit, and the light rail option is only slightly cheaper than the heavy rail option, at. Harford (17) estimates benefit-cost ratios for rail and bus transit systems in 81 urbanized areas in the United States by weighing congestion savings and user benefits against annual capital and operating costs. Capital costs are assumed to be and times the annual operating costs for rail . Light Rail Transit Capital Cost Study, Prepared by Booz-Allen & Hamilton Inc. (April 5, ). Voith, Richard. "The Long-Run Elasticity of Demand for Commuter Rail Transportation," Journal of Urban Economics 30 (), pp.   Heavy rail is proposed as a line from the CBD to Takapuna and onto the busway at Smales Farm. All up, the business case found the capital cost range of its recommended program would be between $6.